Advisory & Consultation Process

NRE Health Institute

This page formalizes external engagement mechanics and signals administrative maturity.

1. Purpose

The Advisory & Consultation Process defines the structured pathway through which external stakeholders may request review, consultation, or technical input from the NRE Health Institute.

This process ensures:

• Procedural clarity
• Defined scope of response
• Documentation discipline
• Resource management
• Accountability in engagement

The Institute provides structured advisory input within the limits of its mandate.

2. Scope of Advisory Services

The Institute may provide structured advisory input in the following areas:

• Preventive health model interpretation
• Standards clarification
• Governance architecture review
• Risk framework consultation
• Policy alignment analysis
• Non-sexual classification clarification
• Documentation structuring guidance

The Institute does not provide:

• Clinical medical advice
• Legal representation
• Enforcement services
• Accreditation certification

Advisory functions are analytical and structural.

3. Consultation Request Procedure

All advisory requests must:

• Be submitted through official Institute channels
• Clearly define the scope of inquiry
• Identify jurisdictional context
• Provide relevant background documentation

Incomplete requests may be returned for clarification.

4. Review & Response Process

Upon receipt of a consultation request:

  1. Scope verification is conducted

  2. Mandate compatibility is assessed

  3. Risk implications are reviewed

  4. Response format is determined

  5. Written advisory output is prepared

Responses may take the form of:

• Formal advisory briefs
• Structured technical notes
• Governance compatibility assessments
• Standards clarification statements

5. Confidentiality & Documentation

Where confidentiality is requested:

• Boundaries are defined in writing
• Scope of disclosure is clarified
• Documentation retention policies apply

All advisory interactions are archived for institutional recordkeeping.

6. Limitation of Liability

Advisory outputs:

• Reflect structured analysis within defined scope
• Do not constitute medical advice
• Do not constitute legal advice
• Do not create statutory authority

Responsibility for implementation remains with the requesting entity.

7. Review & Revision

Advisory outputs may be subject to revision if:

• Regulatory conditions change
• Risk parameters shift
• Additional documentation is provided
• Clarification is formally requested

Revisions follow documented version-control procedures.

8. Institutional Capacity

The Institute may decline advisory requests if:

• Scope exceeds mandate
• Risk exposure is disproportionate
• Documentation is insufficient
• Conflict of interest is identified

Institutional discipline supersedes volume of engagement.