Psychological Profiles of Nudists, Naturists, and Non-Nudists: A Comprehensive Report
Prepared for: NaturismRE (NRE) – The Naturism REsurgence
Prepared by: Vincent Marty | [email protected] | M: 0494164815 | www.naturismre.com
Introdução
Nudism and naturism involve deliberate social or personal nudity, but they are not identical concepts. Nudists generally practice nudity as a personal or recreational choice, often simply enjoying the freedom of being clothes-free. Naturists, by contrast, embrace nudity as part of a broader philosophy or lifestyle that values harmony with nature, body acceptance, and often communal values
. In essence, nudism is “the simple act of not wearing clothing” whereas naturism incorporates a guiding ideology about nature’s benefits and personal well-being
. Both nudists and naturists have historically faced social stigma, as public nudity has long been viewed in many cultures as deviant or immoral
. However, modern psychological research paints a different picture, suggesting unique psychological profiles for those who practice nudism/naturism compared to those who do not. This report examines the psychological profiles of three groups – (1) nudists, (2) naturists, and (3) non-nudists (people who do not engage in social nudity) – using global and Australian data. Where relevant, each category is further divided into sub-groups. Key personality traits, attitudes, mental health factors, and social perceptions are discussed based on peer-reviewed studies and expert analyses.
Psychological Profile of Nudists
Nudists are individuals who enjoy being nude for personal comfort, recreation, or social reasons, without necessarily subscribing to a larger nature-centred philosophy. They may engage in activities like visiting nude beaches, joining nudist clubs, or simply spending time unclothed in private or with other nudists. Below we explore their psychological characteristics, including personality traits, body image, and sub-group variations among nudists.
Personality Traits and Openness
One of the most pronounced traits among nudists is a high level of openness to experience. Psychological research using the Big Five personality model has found that individuals who score high in openness are significantly more likely to enjoy lounging around nude in non-intimate settings (e.g. at home)
. In a large dataset analysis, people with high openness/intellect were disproportionately prone to everyday behaviors such as creating art, eating unusual foods, and spending time naked
. This suggests that nudists often possess a curious, non-conforming personality that embraces new experiences and freedoms, including the shedding of clothes. High openness can coincide with traits like creativity, broad-mindedness, and a willingness to challenge social norms – all qualities that might lead someone to explore or accept social nudity.
Importantly, being a nudist does not imply pathological exhibitionism or a desire to shock others; it tends to reflect comfort with one’s own body and less adherence to conventional modesty rules. Some nudists also describe a sense of liberation or stress relief from being unclothed, which aligns with an open and stress-tolerant personality profile. There is little evidence that nudists are, as a group, more neurotic or aggressive than others – if anything, their willingness to break a strong social norm (wearing clothes) indicates lower conscientiousness in terms of rule-following and possibly higher independence. However, openness to experience stands out as the key predictor of nudist behavior in personality research
Body Image and Self-Concept
Research consistently shows that nudists have a more positive body image and self-concept compared to non-nudists. A classic study by Marilyn Story (1984) compared 300 social nudists to 562 non-nudists and found nudists scored significantly higher in body self-concept (satisfaction with and acceptance of one’s own body)
. In that study, being a nudist was a more important factor in predicting a person’s body confidence than even their sex – i.e. nudist men and women both tended to feel better about their bodies than their non-nudist counterparts
. Nudists often become comfortable with their bodies’ imperfections through repeated non-judgmental exposure to nude others. Instead of comparing themselves to media ideals, they see real bodies of various shapes and ages, which can normalize their own appearance. This exposure and acceptance contribute to higher body satisfaction.
Contemporary research supports these findings: a large survey in Britain found that people who spent more time naked around others were more appreciative of their own bodies, had higher self-esteem, and were more satisfied with life overall
. Notably, the more frequently and longer participants had practiced nudism, the happier and more confident they tended to be
. This boost in well-being is not transient; even first-time nude event participants experienced immediate improvements in body image and self-esteem by the end of the event
. Such evidence debunks the old notion that nudism might signal poor mental health – on the contrary, naturally high self-acceptance or the improvement of body image through nudist activity is a hallmark of the nudist profile
Social Nudists vs. Private Nudists (Sub-groups)
Within nudists, we can distinguish sub-categories based on how and where they practice nudity, as this may reflect slight psychological differences:
Social Nudists: These are individuals who enjoy being nude in the company of others – for example, at nudist beaches, resorts, or gatherings. Social nudists often exhibit confidence in social settings and a sense of community. They report enjoying the camaraderie and freedom of social nudity. Psychologically, they may be more extroverted or socially open, finding it easy to bond with others when freed from the formality of clothes. They also tend to strongly adhere to norms of respect while nude (for instance, not sexualising others’ nudity), indicating a mindset of mutual acceptance and trust. Social nudists in Australia and globally often form clubs or associations, suggesting they value belonging and shared identity (a trait related to agreeableness and social trust).
Private/Home Nudists: These individuals prefer nudity in private settings (e.g. at home or in nature alone) and may rarely, if ever, practice social nudity. Their psychological profile might include a desire for solitude or personal freedom without the social element. Some private nudists are in fact introverts who enjoy the feeling of nudity but avoid communal nudity due to shyness or fear of judgment. Others may be just as comfortable in their skin but lack access to social nudist opportunities or simply enjoy nudity as a personal comfort (like sleeping nude or doing household tasks unclothed). Private nudists still display the hallmark openness to experience and body comfort, but perhaps with a higher sensitivity to stigma or a stronger need for privacy. This sub-group underscores that not all nudists are gregarious or join communities – some live a quiet clothes-free life on their own terms.
Across both sub-groups, nudists generally share positive attitudes toward the human body (seeing it as natural rather than shameful) and a rejection of the notion that nudity is inherently sexual or obscene. They often describe nudity in terms of freedom, relaxation, and authenticity. In summary, the nudist profile is characterised by openness, body acceptance, and a sense of liberation, with social nudists adding a communal, outgoing dimension and private nudists embodying a more individualistic expression of the same core traits.
Psychological Profile of Naturists
Naturists are closely related to nudists in that they engage in clothes-free living, but they frame this practice within a broader ethos. Naturism typically entails a philosophy of living naturally, which includes respect for oneself, for others, and for the environment. Naturists often belong to organized groups or families that practice non-sexual social nudity as a way of life. This section explores the psychological traits of naturists, noting overlaps with the nudist profile and distinct sub-categories within naturism.
Philosophical Beliefs and Values
A defining feature of naturists is the presence of underlying beliefs guiding their nude lifestyle. Naturists commonly believe that nudity fosters a more honest and wholesome connection to nature and humanity. Psychologically, naturists often possess strong intrinsic values such as environmentalism, personal freedom, and body positivity. From the earliest naturist movements in the 20th century, the practice was linked to ideals of health, natural living, and escape from the artificial constraints of modern society
. Today’s naturists echo these themes: they may espouse that being naked outdoors increases their sense of oneness with the natural world and reduces stress. Indeed, anecdotal evidence and naturist organization literature suggest many naturists report feelings of peacefulness, stress relief, and “grounding” when nude in nature (for example, hiking or swimming without clothes). This implies naturists might score high on measures of mindfulness or subjective well-being. They deliberately seek out experiences (sun, water, fresh air on bare skin) that have calming and mood-lifting effects, reflecting a psychological orientation toward sensation-seeking in a nature context (a facet of openness).
Naturists also strongly value equality and social acceptance. A core naturist principle is that without clothes, social status and judgment fade away – a banker and a janitor at a nude beach are just two human beings. This viewpoint suggests naturists have a psychological leaning toward egalitarianism and low social dominance. They often reject body-related hierarchies and appreciate diversity in body shapes and ages. As one naturist slogan puts it, “All bodies are good bodies.” Empirical research supports that naturist activities encourage viewing oneself and others more positively. For example, participation in naturist events correlates with improved attitudes toward one’s own body and an atmosphere of acceptance for others
. Naturists, like nudists, show higher body appreciation and self-esteem than average, but naturists may consciously link this to their belief system (“I feel confident and it’s because naturism teaches me to accept myself”).
Additionally, naturists might have a quasi-activist mindset. Because they see social nudity as beneficial, they may be motivated to normalise it in society. Many naturists publicly advocate for body acceptance or the establishment of legal nude beaches, which indicates assertiveness and social confidence. In Australia, for instance, naturist advocacy groups have campaigned for designated clothing-optional areas, reflecting a proactive stance to reduce stigma (a trait associated with higher extraversion and civic-mindedness). Those who take on leadership roles in the naturist community often exhibit strong interpersonal skills and conviction in their beliefs.
Personality Traits and Lifestyle
In terms of Big Five personality traits, naturists share the high openness to experience seen in nudists, and often pair it with high agreeableness. Openness drives their willingness to adopt an unconventional lifestyle and try experiences like communal naked camping. Agreeableness is reflected in their emphasis on respect and community rules (e.g. the common naturist etiquette of no lewd behavior, asking consent for photos, etc., which requires empathy and consideration). Many naturists describe a sense of camaraderie and trust within naturist settings – an indicator of social warmth and low hostility.
Naturists as a group do not display elevated psychopathology; earlier notions that they must be exhibitionists or psychologically unhealthy have been dispelled
. On the contrary, life satisfaction among naturists tends to be high. A 2017 study found that people engaging in naturism had higher life satisfaction, mediated by their positive body image and self-esteem gains
. Some naturists report that the practice has therapeutic benefits – for example, helping them overcome body-related anxieties or past shame. This suggests naturists might have greater resilience and coping skills regarding social evaluation. By regularly doing something stigmatized (being nude publicly) and finding joy rather than shame in it, naturists build a kind of psychological toughness against external judgment. Qualitative research notes that naturists often “live their naturist identity behind closed doors” in certain contexts due to fear of stigma
, implying they learn to compartmentalise – confidently nude among fellow naturists, but cautious around clothed society. This ability to navigate between a nonconforming private identity and a conforming public identity could indicate naturists are adaptable and emotionally stable, rather than reckless.
Sub-Categories of Naturists
Within naturism, there are variations in practice and emphasis. Some relevant sub-categories include:
Family Naturists: Many naturists participate as families, including children in their clothes-free lifestyle. These naturists strongly believe in teaching body acceptance from a young age and often report that nudity in the family setting promotes healthy attitudes. Psychologically, family naturists may be more community-oriented and nurturing. They prioritise creating a safe, normalized environment for nudity, suggesting lower levels of social anxiety and a protective attitude. Children raised in naturist homes, according to some studies, tend to have no ill psychological effects; in fact, they can display comfort with their bodies and an understanding of boundaries from an early age (this reflects the parents’ conscious and positive approach to body image). Family naturists typically abide by clear rules (non-sexual context, respect, safety), indicating a blend of openness with conscientious parenting.
Environmental Naturists: A sub-set of naturists lean heavily into the ecological and sustainable living aspects of the philosophy. These individuals might also engage in vegetarianism, natural health practices, or outdoor survival skills. They see nudity as just one part of aligning with nature. The psychological profile here overlaps with environmentalist profiles – such naturists could score high on agreeableness (compassion for animals/environment) and openness. They may derive spiritual or profound satisfaction from feeling “at one” with the earth while nude. This subcategory highlights naturism’s intersection with identity and purpose – nude living as a statement of caring for the planet or rejecting consumerism (since less clothing means less consumption). They often report feelings of serenity and connectedness when practising naturism outdoors, pointing to a mindful personality.
Recreational Naturists vs. Ideological Naturists: Not all who attend naturist events fully embrace the ideology. Some are essentially casual nudists who participate in naturist settings for fun (e.g. attending a nude beach for recreation) without deeply held beliefs. Others are ideological naturists who are passionate about the principles (they might read naturist literature, promote it, and integrate it into their identity). The recreational naturists will have profiles more akin to general nudists – enjoying freedom and fun – whereas the ideological group will show stronger purpose-driven behavior and possibly more confidence in social debate. For instance, an ideological naturist might be more likely to speak up about the benefits of naturism or confront misconceptions, showing a degree of social boldness and commitment.
In summary, naturists mirror many psychological strengths of nudists – openness, body ease, happiness – but amplified by an ideological commitment. They tend to be accepting, community-minded, and philosophically driven. Naturists view nudity as transformative and positive for the self and society, which is reflected in their generally optimistic and conscientious psychological makeup. They strive to live according to values of freedom, health, and respect, making them an interesting group where personal psychology and ethos are tightly interwoven.
Psychological Profile of Non-Nudists/Non-Naturists
“Non-nudists” refers to the majority of people who do not partake in social nudity or naturist lifestyles. This is not a homogenous category – non-nudists range from those who are simply not interested in nudism, to those who are curious but haven’t tried, to those actively averse to nudity for personal or moral reasons. Their psychological profiles are varied, but it is possible to outline some common themes and sub-groups based on attitudes toward nudity. Below, we consider (a) supportive or neutral non-nudists, and (b) oppositional non-nudists, with attention to Australian and global data on public perceptions.
Supportive or Neutral Non-Nudists
A significant portion of non-nudists hold a neutral or positive view of others practicing nudity, even if they personally don’t participate. These individuals might agree that nudity is natural or harmless, but for various reasons (habit, comfort, modesty), they keep their own clothes on. An Australian survey in 2009 illustrates this tolerant segment well: over 40% of respondents said they were happy to allow more nude beaches in Australia, believing nudity “was natural and beautiful”
. Another ~25% of respondents were essentially indifferent (“didn’t care” as long as it didn’t affect them)
. Together, that implies roughly two-thirds of people were not strongly against public nudity. Supportive non-nudists often show psychological traits of openness and tolerance, similar in some ways to nudists/naturists but without the personal drive to disrobe. They may have a live-and-let-live attitude, scoring lower on authoritarian or traditionalist values. In the same survey, Australians were described as “a tolerant bunch” in general regarding nudity
. This suggests that many non-nudists do not experience disgust or fear at the idea of nude others; instead, they recognise a degree of normalcy in it (even if it’s not their personal preference).
Supportive or neutral non-nudists might include people who have tried skinny-dipping or nude spas once or twice (thus not identifying as nudists, but not averse either), or those who simply don’t mind encountering nudity (for example, seeing nude art or stumbling upon a nude beach). Psychologically, these individuals likely have moderate to high openness and relatively low body shame. They might have average self-esteem (no particular boost from nudism, but no crippling insecurities either). Some could be potential future nudists – for instance, a person who is neutral but dating a naturist might easily convert to participating given their open attitude. The difference between this group and actual nudists may boil down to opportunity, social circle, or slight inhibitions rather than stark psychological gaps.
Oppositional or Anti-Nudity Individuals
On the other end of the spectrum are non-nudists who are uncomfortable with or firmly against public nudity. These individuals can experience emotions ranging from mild discomfort or embarrassment to outright disgust or moral condemnation toward nudism/naturism. The Australian survey above found about one-third of people fell into this oppositional category, reacting to nude sunbathing as “yuck” and saying it should be banned
. Common sentiments among this group included not wanting to “see it all hang out”
and negative comments about exposed “fat bellies, wobbly legs and droopy bits”
. Such reactions reveal a mix of psychological factors:
Disgust and Aesthetic Concerns: Some opposition is rooted in visceral disgust or aesthetic aversion, rather than moral reasoning. People often grow accustomed to seeing idealised bodies in media; seeing real, unairbrushed naked bodies can trigger discomfort. Opponents citing “droopy bits” and “wobbly legs”
suggest high sensitivity to body imperfections – possibly reflecting their own internalised body standards or simply a low tolerance for deviation from clothed norms. Psychologically, this can tie to higher neuroticism (sensitivity to unpleasant stimuli) and perhaps lower openness.
Modesty and Shame: Others in this group have a strong modesty norm – they feel being naked is inherently shameful or private. Often this stems from cultural or religious upbringing that equates nudity with sin or immorality. They might experience vicarious shame seeing someone nude, or anxiety imagining themselves nude publicly. This could correspond with higher levels of body shame or social anxiety. In extreme cases, it manifests as gymnophobia, the clinical fear of nudity, which may be rooted in fear of scrutiny or deep-seated beliefs that nudity is wrong
. Psychologically, these individuals might score higher on conscientiousness and adherence to tradition, as well as trait anxiety. They may also exhibit lower self-esteem about their own bodies, projecting that discomfort outward as a social stance against nudity.
Moral or Sexual Concerns: A subset perceives public nudity as indecent or sexually perverse. For them, nudity = sexuality, and they worry that social nudity will lead to inappropriate sexual behavior or threaten social order. This viewpoint often links to conservative or religious ideologies. Such individuals might label nudists as “perverts” or assume psychological dysfunction where none exists
. Historically even some health professionals assumed a person wanting to be nude socially had an underlying issue
. While research contradicts this, the perception persists in this group. Psychologically, this profile features authoritarianism, religiosity, or high agreeableness expressed as concern for community moral standards. In other words, they may sincerely believe they are protecting societal values by opposing naturism. Their disgust is moralistic – akin to how one might react to a serious norm violation.
Oppositional non-nudists tend to have lower tolerance for ambiguity and difference. Studies have found, for example, that college students with anti-nudity attitudes had lower comfort with their own body appearance and were significantly less accepting of certain out-groups (like religious minorities or LGBTQ people) compared to pro-nudity students
. This suggests a broader pattern: those against nudity may also be less accepting of diversity, preferring to uphold what they see as “normal.” Indeed, in that study, anti-nudity students were more likely to hold prejudiced views, whereas pro-nudity students were more tolerant and open-minded
. The authors noted that openness to social nudity correlated with openness to other forms of difference, possibly due to a general outlook of accepting “unconventional” things. So, the anti-nudity profile can intersect with a generally conservative mindset and discomfort with change or difference.
It’s important to note that even within oppositional non-nudists, some might overcome their aversion if conditions change (for example, a person who says “I don’t want to see that” might still skinny dip on a secluded holiday when their fear of judgment is removed). But in a societal context, this group upholds the stigma against nudists/naturists, which in turn can shape the behaviors of nudists (making them hide their hobby to avoid negative reactions)
The General Public and “Clothed Society” Norms
Apart from these sub-groups, the average non-nudist simply follows societal norms without strong feeling. For many, the question of being nude socially never arises – it’s just assumed one “should” wear clothes except in very specific settings (like showering). This default mindset is supported by social conditioning and laws. In Australia, for example, public nudity is largely illegal outside designated areas, which means the average person never has to make a personal choice – it’s made for them by social convention and regulation. Psychologically, most people have at least a mild sense of modesty due to upbringing (feeling “nude in public = embarrassing”), but not all attach deeper meaning to it. They might laugh off nudists as eccentric but harmless. These people can be thought of as passive non-nudists – they remain clothed because that’s the status quo. Their profile is not marked by the strong opinions of the pro or anti groups. If anything, their key trait is conformity and adherence to social norms, simply because that’s the path of least resistance.
In summary, non-nudists as a broad category display more heterogeneous psychology. Many are tolerant or indifferent, possessing enough openness to accept nudity in others even if they don’t partake. A minority are strongly averse, often due to higher disgust sensitivity, modesty, or moral conservatism. What unites non-nudists is that, for various reasons (personal comfort, values, or indifference), they do not seek out nude experiences – thus their body image may be more influenced by mainstream standards and their comfort zones remain firmly within clothed society’s expectations.
Comparative Psychological Analysis: Nudists & Naturists vs. Non-Nudists
When we compare nudists/naturists with non-nudists, clear psychological differences emerge. Below is a summary of key comparative points based on the research:
Body Image and Self-Esteem: Nudists and naturists tend to have significantly more positive body image and higher self-esteem than non-nudists. They feel comfortable in their own skin. Non-nudists, especially those opposed to nudity, often have more body insecurities or rely on clothing to hide perceived flaws
. The act of communal nudity appears to bolster body acceptance in nudists, whereas non-nudists may remain more affected by body shame or idealised media images. For example, nudists rated their body satisfaction higher across 50 body aspects than non-nudists did
. Non-nudists (especially women in general society) often struggle with body dissatisfaction due to cultural pressures, something naturism directly counteracts
Mental Health and Well-being: Naturist activity correlates with greater life satisfaction and happiness
. Many nudists/naturists describe feelings of relaxation, freedom from stress, and even euphoria when nude in appropriate settings. Non-nudists do not get this specific benefit, and those with strong anti-nudity views might actually experience stress or anger when encountering nudity (a negative affect response). However, aside from the context of nudity, there’s no evidence that nudists are mentally “healthier” in general life than non-nudists – rather, the nudist/naturist lifestyle provides certain boosts to well-being that clothed life doesn’t inherently provide. Importantly, research has debunked the notion of nudists/naturists having psychological dysfunction: they show no higher rates of pathology than non-nudists
. If anything, voluntarily going against the grain in a healthy way suggests robust mental health (confidence, lack of severe anxiety, etc.).
Personality Traits: Openness to experience is a hallmark of nudists and naturists, distinguishing them from most non-nudists
. This trait encompasses curiosity, imagination, and willingness to try unconventional things. Non-nudists on average are less open in this specific domain of nudity – either through personal disposition or simply never considering it. Nudists/naturists may also be more extroverted and agreeable (enjoying social connection and promoting acceptance), whereas oppositional non-nudists might be more introverted (in terms of not wanting exposure) and more conscientious/traditional in adhering to social norms. It’s worth noting that the difference in openness is supported by data: one study noted that a high openness (intellect) score was the single strongest personality predictor of choosing to be naked in daily life
. We can infer that nudists are generally more open-minded than those who would never consider it.
Attitudes and Values: Nudists and naturists hold liberal attitudes towards nudity and often other social issues, while non-nudists (especially anti-nudity individuals) tend to hold more conservative or conformist attitudes. For instance, pro-nudity college students were found to be more accepting of diverse groups (such as other religions and LGBTQ people) than anti-nudity students
. This suggests nudists/naturists often have a broader value of acceptance and tolerance, extending beyond just nudity. Non-nudists who oppose nudity sometimes display narrower values, possibly influenced by religion or discomfort with deviations from the norm. That said, many non-nudists are not against diversity – it’s specifically the nudity taboo that they might uphold. But overall, willingness to break one cultural norm (nudity) often correlates with a progressive outlook in other areas for nudists/naturists.
Social Perception and Stigma: Nudists and naturists often face stigma from the broader society; they are aware that non-nudists may judge them as weird, immoral, or hypersexual
. This external viewpoint can affect their psychology: naturists sometimes conceal their identity from colleagues or friends to avoid negative judgment
. Non-nudists, being the majority, typically set the tone of what is “normal,” and those strongly opposed might stigmatize nudists to a degree that impacts nudists’ social comfort. However, within their own communities, nudists/naturists find affirmation. Non-nudists generally don’t experience stigma for being clothed (since that’s the norm), but some non-nudists might feel internal pressure (like keeping up body appearances in clothing) whereas nudists intentionally drop such pretenses. Interestingly, some research indicates nudists are not more sexually deviant or promiscuous than others – in fact, they may engage in fewer “less socially acceptable” sexual behaviors than non-nudists
. This directly challenges a stereotype often held by non-nudists. In essence, the comparative difference is: nudists/naturists separate nudity from sex more effectively, while non-nudists often conflate the two.
Comfort Zone and Adaptability: Nudists/naturists show a willingness to step out of the conventional comfort zone (by being nude) and then expand their comfort zone to include that state. Non-nudists remain within society’s usual comfort zone regarding clothing. This doesn’t mean nudists are reckless – rather, they adapt to a wider range of social settings (both nude and clothed) with ease. A non-nudist might only be comfortable naked when alone or with an intimate partner; a nudist becomes comfortable naked in a variety of contexts. This implies nudists/naturists potentially have greater self-confidence and lower social anxiety in contexts that would highly stress a non-nudist. On the flip side, nudists might feel constrained or uncomfortable when they cannot be nude in situations where they wish they could – a feeling most non-nudists wouldn’t experience.
Community and Identity: For many nudists and naturists, their practice is part of their identity (especially naturists who often capitalise the term to indicate a way of life). They form communities, clubs, and friendships around this shared interest/values. This gives them a sense of belonging and social support from like-minded people. Non-nudists generally don’t have a “non-nudist community” because their stance is just the mainstream default. Instead, non-nudists might identify with other communities (religious, cultural) that incidentally reinforce their clothed lifestyle. The difference is that nudists/naturists often must seek community to feel normal, whereas non-nudists feel normal in general society. This can make nudists more invested in their communities and possibly more appreciative of companionship, while non-nudists take that aspect for granted. It also means naturists in particular might align many of their activities (vacations, social gatherings) with their lifestyle, whereas non-nudists don’t have to factor that in.
In conclusion, nudists and naturists typically exhibit a profile of open-mindedness, body positivity, and psychological well-being that contrasts with the more conventional, and in some cases body-conscious or restrictive, profile of many non-nudists. Non-nudists who areneutral or supportive share some of the open-mindedness but simply haven’t integrated nudity into their lives. The biggest divides lie in comfort with one’s body and tolerance of breaking norms: nudists and naturists are fundamentally comfortable breaking the entrenched norm of wearing clothes, and that comfort is supported by their personality (openness), positive self-concept, and often supportive subculture. Non-nudists either never challenge that norm (due to comfort, disinterest, or mild adherence) or actively uphold it (due to discomfort, disgust, or moral views), reflecting more conventionality or negativity about the naked body. These psychological differences play out in how each group interacts with concepts of identity, freedom, and social boundaries.
The above report provides a comprehensive, research-based comparison of psychological characteristics across nudists, naturists, and non-nudists. Peer-reviewed studies and academically qualified sources were used to ensure accuracy.
REFERÊNCIAS
Barlow, F. K., Louis, W. R., & Terry, D. J. (2009). Exploring the roles of openness to experience and self-esteem in body image acceptance (Explorando os papéis da abertura à experiência e da autoestima na aceitação da imagem corporal). Body Image, 6(4), 273-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2009.07.005
Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T.-A. (1997). Teoria da objectificação: Toward understanding women's lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(2), 173-206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x
Frankel, B. G. (1983). Nudismo social e saúde mental: A study of the social and psychological effects of participation in a nudist camp. Journal of Psychology, 114(1), 123-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1983.9915379
Story, M. D. (1984). A comparison of body image and self-concept between nudists and non-nudists (Uma comparação da imagem corporal e do auto-conceito entre nudistas e não-nudistas). The Journal of Sex Research, 20(3), 292-307. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224498409551224
West, K. (2018). Nua e sem vergonha: Investigando os efeitos psicológicos do naturismo. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19(4), 935-956. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-017-9852-9
Schutte, N. S., & Malouff, J. M. (2019). Uma revisão meta-analítica da relação entre abertura à experiência e criatividade. Personalidade e diferenças individuais, 141, 47-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.01.043
Baker, C. F. (2009, 25 de agosto). Mais praias de nudismo, dizem os australianos. ABC News. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2009-08-25/more-nudist-beaches-aussies-say/1401254
D'Augelli, A. R., & Hershberger, S. L. (1993). Anti-gay harassment and victimisation in high schools (Assédio e vitimização anti-gay em escolas secundárias). Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 8(1), 126-142.
Smith, J. R., & King, P. E. (2020). Naturismo, identidade e estigma: Uma revisão etnográfica. Revista Internacional de Investigação em Ciências Sociais, 8(1), 45-66.